Johnson v. McIntosh is one of the most important cases ruled on by the United States Supreme Court. Decided in 1823, the Court adopted the international law of colonialism, called today the Doctrine of Discovery, to be the controlling legal precedent on whether American Indian nations owned the absolute title, or the fee simple title, to their lands and thereby possessed the property right to sell land to whomever they wished for whatever amount they could negotiate. The Supreme Court held that under the Doctrine of Discovery, Indigenous nations had lost the full ownership of their lands and could only sell to the government that held the discovery preemption power, that is, the right to be the only purchaser. Johnson is still the law today...
Litigation involving Indian claims in the modern era often revolves around the complex and expensive...
In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Chief Justice John Marshall declared that Indian tribes should be ac...
Chief Justice\u27s Marshall\u27s opinion in Johnson v. M\u27Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.)543 (1823) has...
Johnson v. McIntosh is one of the most important cases ruled on by the United States Supreme Court. ...
The backstory on the court decision that defined and limited American Indian property rights. The U....
In Johnson v. McIntosh, John Marshall proclaimed that European discovery of America “gave exclusive ...
In the first four decades of the nineteenth century, the United States Supreme Court handed down fiv...
The Doctrine of Discovery provides that colonizing European nations automatically acquired certain p...
The legacies of allotment on reservations—fractionated heirship and dispossession most notably—have ...
The Supreme Court’s 1823 decision in Johnson v. M’Intosh is a foundation case in both Indian Law and...
A title to lands, under grants to private Individuals, made by Indian tribes or Nations northwest of...
[F]rom the very moment the general government came into existence to this time, it has exercised its...
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, submitted October 23, 1902 and decided December 1, 1902,...
Since settlers set foot in the Americas, tension has existed between American Indian tribes and Euro...
Demands for citizens\u27 civil rights has been a recurrent theme of contemporary society for nearl...
Litigation involving Indian claims in the modern era often revolves around the complex and expensive...
In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Chief Justice John Marshall declared that Indian tribes should be ac...
Chief Justice\u27s Marshall\u27s opinion in Johnson v. M\u27Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.)543 (1823) has...
Johnson v. McIntosh is one of the most important cases ruled on by the United States Supreme Court. ...
The backstory on the court decision that defined and limited American Indian property rights. The U....
In Johnson v. McIntosh, John Marshall proclaimed that European discovery of America “gave exclusive ...
In the first four decades of the nineteenth century, the United States Supreme Court handed down fiv...
The Doctrine of Discovery provides that colonizing European nations automatically acquired certain p...
The legacies of allotment on reservations—fractionated heirship and dispossession most notably—have ...
The Supreme Court’s 1823 decision in Johnson v. M’Intosh is a foundation case in both Indian Law and...
A title to lands, under grants to private Individuals, made by Indian tribes or Nations northwest of...
[F]rom the very moment the general government came into existence to this time, it has exercised its...
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, submitted October 23, 1902 and decided December 1, 1902,...
Since settlers set foot in the Americas, tension has existed between American Indian tribes and Euro...
Demands for citizens\u27 civil rights has been a recurrent theme of contemporary society for nearl...
Litigation involving Indian claims in the modern era often revolves around the complex and expensive...
In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Chief Justice John Marshall declared that Indian tribes should be ac...
Chief Justice\u27s Marshall\u27s opinion in Johnson v. M\u27Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.)543 (1823) has...